Monday, 10 February 2020

Jungle (2017) ***


 
Source: Imdb
This adventure film with Daniel Radcliffe was not half-bad. The pacing of the story was interesting as half the movie was dedicated to friendships under pressure, and the other half to survival. The film started by romantic illustrations of a backpacker’s life that kindle a yearning to just drop everything and go. It continues with an adventure that sounded like a fun idea at first, but turns into a breaking test for friendships. It’s interesting to see the strain mounting on the relationships between the characters, and witness the first hints of approaching catastrophe. The second half is dedicated mostly to a tale of survival against impossible odds (it took a few pages out of “128 hours” for that), and the beauty of unwavering friendship.
The acting in this was spot-on. I’m always impressed by Daniel Radcliffe and how completely he has left behind “Harry Potter”. In this, he gives a hands-on performance with just the right balance of subtle and brash. His character is learning about himself, discovering his true heart, and you absolutely buy it.
Visually, this was expertly done. It really does look like genuine jungle. The cinematography was beautiful, with wonderfully composed shots and a lovely palette of colour and contrast. Though they did put in a few tropes and clichés, it wasn’t too glaring. I wonder how they managed Daniel’s transformation from ripped traveller to starved skeleton.
Overall, a good adventure film. The only flaw it had was that it failed to engage me fully on an emotional level and therefore felt a bit long. 3/5

No comments:

Post a Comment